The Wise Imaam

Take for example the Imaam (rahima-hullaah) would [take to account and] punish those who smoked [tobacco] – [this was at the time] when [smoking] first appeared [in the Arabian Peninsula] – about 250 years ago – there were those who smoked; So he would reprimand and censure whoever smoked so that [this evil habit] does not spread amongst the people.

On one [particular] occasion [at the time] he gathered a number of the tribes – between whom there had occurred [some] trials and tribulations quite possibly resulting in killings.

So the leaders of these Bedouin tribes were invited to ad-Dar’iyyah and al-Imaam Muhammad ibn ‘Abdil-Wahhaab spoke to them [all] and implored them to stop the bloodshed, and seek to rectify [the affairs] between them – [something] which they [subsequently] adhered to.

[At the time of prayer] whilst one of the tribal leaders was praying, a smoker’s pipe fell [from his pocket]; [This was] a pipe which would be filled – at the time – I don’t know its shape, but I read it [to be] like this.

[So it was] a pipe which would be filled with tobacco, and thereafter be lit.

So a pipe fell out [of his pocket] in the masjid, and [some of] the people saw it. When the Imaam – Muhammad ibn ‘Abdil-Wahhaab – saw it, he turned [his gaze] away.

So they (the onlookers) said he just picked up his pipe and put it [back] in his pocket. “He smokes, [surely] he should be censured.”

And another one said: “How?! How can you not censure him?!”

Shaykh Muhammad ibn ‘Abdil-Wahhaab said: “We did not see anything.”

They said: “We did see O Shaykh.” [He replied:] “We did not see anything.”

[And] so he left the tribal leader [alone] and did not say a thing to him, instead anticipating [Allaah’s] guidance [for him].

[Notice] the [critical, yet delicate]circumstances [surrounding this tribal leader]; Had he been in any other situation he would certainly have been censured and reprimanded.

However, as he was in this [critical, yet delicate] situation, the [wise and] reformist Imaam commented: “This is not appropriate. [Do you really] think before this bloodshed and killing stops, I should [go] confront him to censure and reprimand him for smoking?!”

“This is not from the [befitting] actions of the Imaams, nor from the [befitting] actions of those who [thoroughly] understand the legal objectives – مَقَاصِدُ الشَّرْعِيَّة – in [all] affairs.”

So the da’wah [of tawheed] has not varied in its application from the early scholars of the first Saudi State [1744-1818], and nor from the second Saudi State [1824-1891], and nor from the third Saudi State [1924-present day]; So it [remains] one institute of knowledge and learning.

However, the general attainment of benefit [as opposed to harm] is [always] sought.

[The reason being] because during his life, the [wise and] reformist Imaam adapted his approach [to the circumstances he faced] and [here in Saudi Arabia] we have not adopted this approach out of blindly following him, rather, because the general attainment of legislated benefit dictates this.

And as we have said [before], the Imaams of the da’wah [of tawheed] after him have remained clear and apparent [in their approach] in accordance with that which the legislated commands and applicable evidences dictate.

He is a graduate of the Islaamic University of Madeenah, having graduated from the Institute of Arabic Language, and later the Faculty of Sharee'ah in 2004. He currently resides in Birmingham, UK.

Related posts

Leave a Reply