Imaam Abu 'Abdullaah ibn Muhammad Ibn Battah al-'Akbaree al-Hanbalee (d. 387 A.H.) reports in his 'Ibaanatul-Kubra' (2/460/no.443):
Abul-Qaasim Hafs ibn 'Umar narrated to us, saying:
Abu Haatim ar-Raazee narrated to us, saying:
Muhammad ibn 'Ubaadah ibn al-Bakhtaree narrated to us, saying:
'Ubaadah ibn Kulayb Abu Ghassan al-Laythee narrated to us from Muhammad ibn an-Nadr al-Haarithee, who said:
((Whoever listens to a person of innovation and knows that he is a person of innovation - then he is left to himself and leaves the protection of Allaah)).
al-Imaam al-Haafiz Abul-Qaasim Habatullaah ibn al-Hasan ibn Mansoor at-Tabaree al-Laalikaa'ee (d.418 A.H.) reports in his "Sharh Usool I'tiqaad Ahlis-Sunnah wal-Jamaa'ah" - Volume 1 Pages 135-136 No. 252
Ref: Fatwa-Online
|
Shaykh Rabee ibn Haadee al-Madkhalee said:
"The second category or type of people are the students of knowledge who do not possess the accuracy and precision or the correct actualization in this affair, (ليس عندهم تحقيق في هدا الباب) so that which is `waajib` (obligatory and binding) upon them is to accept the statements of scholars who have already preceded them in declaring someone to be reliable or unreliable because they (the students of knowledge) are reliant and dependant upon the first category of people (the scholars) in Al-Jarh wa-Ta`deel."
Ref: Who are the ones fit to do Jarh wa Ta’deel? - Part 2
|
|
|
 |
Reference: www.rabee.net |
O our Shaykh (حفظكم الله), there is a question going around the students of knowledge regarding an individual who has fallen into an innovation. Is it conditional in order to declare him to be an innovator, that the proof be established against him first, or is this not required?
Al Khateeb also mentioned the story about Dawud Al Asbahaanee Ad Dhaahiree, that he used to have a good relationship with Saaleh Ibn Ahmad. So once, he came to Baghdad requesting that Saaleh show some lenience towards him in his seeking permission to enter upon his (Saaleh’s) father, (Ahmad). So Saaleh went to his father and said to him:
“There is a man requesting permission to enter upon you.”
His father said to him:
“What is his name?”
Dawud replied:
“Saaleh.”
So his father questioned:
“Where is he from?”
Saaleh replied:
“He is from the people of Asbahaan.”
So his father said, questioning further:
“What do you make of him?”
So Saaleh gave his father a brief introduction about him. So Abu ‘Abdullah didn’t cease scrutinizing him up until he realized and became well aware, and said:
“Indeed, Muhammad Ibn Yahyaa An Naisaabooree wrote to me informing me about his, (Dawud Al Asbahaanee’s), condition, that he claims that the Quran has been created. So don’t let him in!”
Saaleh responded by saying:
“O my father! He denies and rejects this!”
So Abu ‘Abdullah said:
“Muhammad Ibn Yahyaa is more truthful than him. So don’t give him permission to enter and approach me!” [Taareekh Al-Baghdaad, vol 8/p: 374].
 |
Date Published: Saturday, 08 January 2005 |
 |
This article has been read 3,028 times |
 |
Print this article |
 |
This article has been published with the permission of the translator, who affirms the accuracy of his translation of this article as well as the authenticity of the original Arabic source. Should you have any comment(s) and/or correction(s) to suggest, please write to us at:
...and your email will be passed on to him, inshaa.-Allaah. |
شيخنا -حفظكم الله- هناك سؤال يدور بين طلاب العلم، وهو: هل يشترط في تبديع من وقع في بدعة أو بدع أن تقام عليه الحجة لكي يبدع أولا يشترط ذلك، أفيدونا جزاكم الله خيراً؟ |
وقدم داود الأصبهاني الظاهري بغداد وكان بينه وبين صالح بن أحمد حَسنٌ، فكلم صالحاً أن يتلطف له في الاستئذان على أبيه، فأتى صالح أباه فقال له: رجل سألني أن يأتيك. قال: ما اسمه؟. قال: داود. قال: من أين؟ قال: من أهل أصبهان، قال: أيّ شيء صنعته؟ قال وكان صالح يروغ عن تعريفه إيَّاه، فما زال أبو عبد الله يفحص عنه حتى فطن فقال: هذا قد كتب إليّ محمد بن يحيى النيسابوري في أمره أنه زعم أن القرآن محدث فلا يقربني. قال: يا أبت ينتفي من هذا وينكره، فقال أبو عبد الله: محمد بن يحيى أصدق منه، لا تأذن له في المصير إليَّ. [تاريخ بغداد ( 8/374 |
|
|
