al-Buwaytee said:
((I heard ash-Shaafi’ee say: Adhere to the people of hadeeth, for certainly they are the most correct people))
Siyar A'laam an-Nubalaa. - Volume 10, Page 70
Ref: Fatwa-Online
|
Allamah Abdul-Jaleel Samrodi said:
"You should know that the congregational du`aa that is practiced after the obligatory prayers, audibly [or silently], by the Imams of the Masjids along with the worshippers repeatedly responding with “Ameen! Ameen!” aloud has not been Islamically legislated in the Qur`an or Sunnah."
Ref: Congregational Du`aa after obligatory Prayers
|
|
|
 |
Reference: www.rabee.net |
O our Shaykh (حفظكم الله), there is a question going around the students of knowledge regarding an individual who has fallen into an innovation. Is it conditional in order to declare him to be an innovator, that the proof be established against him first, or is this not required?
Benefit us, jazaakaAllaahu khayra.
“In the name of Allaah The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy. All praise is due to Allaah and may the peace and blessings be upon the Messenger of Allaah, his family, companions and whosoever follows his guidance. To proceed:
That which is well known from Ahlus Sunnah is that whosoever falls into an affair that amounts up to Kufr (disbelief) then he is not to be declared a disbeliever up until the proof has been established against him. (من وقع في أمر مكفر لا يكفر حتى تقام عليه الحجة)
As for someone who falls into an innovation, then he is from one of the following categories:
1) The first category:
Ahlul Bidah (The people of innovations); such as the Rawaafidh, the Khawaarij, the Jahmiyyah, the Qadariyyah, the Mu’tazilah, the Soofees, the Grave Worshippers, the Murji’ah and whosoever is attached and affiliated to them such as the groups ‘Al Ikhwaan Al Muslimeen’ and Jamaa’tu At Tableegh’.
The Salaf did not make it conditional that the proof had to be established upon them in order to declare them as innovators. (لم يشترط السلف إقامة الحجة من أجل الحكم عليهم بالبدعة)
So it is said concerning the Raafidhee that he is a ‘mubtadi,’ (an innovator), and likewise the Khaarijee is considered as an innovator etc, and this is the case whether the proof has been established against them or not.
 |
Date Published: Thursday, 28 October 2004 |
 |
This article has been read 5,321 times |
 |
Print this article |
 |
This article has been published with the permission of the translator, who affirms the accuracy of his translation of this article as well as the authenticity of the original Arabic source. Should you have any comment(s) and/or correction(s) to suggest, please write to us at:
...and your email will be passed on to him, inshaa.-Allaah. |
شيخنا -حفظكم الله- هناك سؤال يدور بين طلاب العلم، وهو: هل يشترط في تبديع من وقع في بدعة أو بدع أن تقام عليه الحجة لكي يبدع أولا يشترط ذلك، أفيدونا جزاكم الله خيراً؟ |
بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم الحمد لله والصلاة والسلام على رسول الله وعلى آله وصحبه ومن ابتع هداه. أما بعد: فالمشهور عن أهل السنة أنه من وقع في أمر مكفر لا يكفر حتى تقام عليه الحجة. أما من وقع في بدعة فعلى أقسام: القسم الأول: أهل البدع كالروافد والخوارج والجهمية والقدرية والمعتزلة والصوفية القبورية والمرجئة ومن يلحق بهم كالإخوان والتبليغ وأمثالهم فهؤلاء لم يشترط السلف إقامة الحجة من أجل الحكم عليهم بالبدعة فالرافضي يقال عنه: مبتدع والخارجي يقال عنه: مبتدع وهكذا، سواء أقيمت عليهم الحجة أم لا |
|
|
